Three Things Anent Which I Do Not Write, and the Converse Thereof

Neil Murton, long-time friend, author, and cultist of Magpie, tagged me in the Three Things I Don’t Write About and Three Things I Do Blog Hop. Which I thought rather convenient, because after a week’s holiday I hadn’t done anything to post about today. Unfortunately, the question turned out to be a real head-scratcher.

Neil already highlighted the difficulty for someone who generally writes the story not the genre: there is not much I haven’t either written or would be happy to write, especially as I like to experiment with new things occasionally to find out if I like them.

After letting it mull in my unconscious over my stay-cation, I thought I had found three things. Then I remembered I had read my Herodotus: each creation creates its opposite; by including something in this post as something I would not write about, I am writing about how I would not write about it, so am writing about it.

Fortunately, I found a solution:

  1. [SUBJECT REDACTED]

  2. [SUBJECT REDACTED]

  3. [SUBJECT REDACTED]

Picking three things I do write about was considerably easier:

  1. Lovecraftian Horror: the first short story I wrote that I was still happy with when I came back to it years later was about a FBI investigation of mysterious disappearances similar to those from August Derleths’s ‘Whisperer in Darkness’. Since then I have come back to the idea of ancient powers half-sleeping next to common perception repeatedly, and am currently mulling ideas for a Mythos collection when I finish a current project.

  2. Very British English: After attending public school, and studying and practising law for decades, I was aware that I wrote in a more formal style than some; however, now I have seen the external edits on Greenstar Episode 1 I have discovered I use grammatical and syntactic structures that no longer exist outside of very traditional British English.

  3. Comedy: I have had a wry wit for many decades, but discovered while working on Greenstar I can also make a reasonable bash at other areas of humour. I am however, still holding out against Simon’s inclination to single entendré.

I am supposed to have tagged people to follow me. Instead, having been extremely lawyerly earlier in the post, I am cocking a snook to ‘should’ and leaving it up to readers whether they use the theme for a post or not.

Do you know what was deeper beneath the Curwen Farm? Are night gaunts the only thing to be funny in both senses?

Advertisements

Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s